Global Temperatures Global Troposphere Temperatures click here For full size []]
Providing Insight
Into Climate Change

Climate Change Your Mind: Response to "Canada's Changing Climate Report 2019"

Summary Environment and Climate Change Canada issued a report entitled “Canada’s Changing Climate Report 2019” (CCCR2019) on April 2, 2019 which sparked headlines world-wide claiming that Canada was warming ‘twice as fast as the global average temperature.’1 The report made predictions of increased weather extremes such as flooding, wildfires and heatwaves, unless drastic cuts to greenhouse gas emissions and the use of fossil fuels were implemented. Climate scientist has shown that the sun is the major driver of climate change the the climate models utilized by the CCCR2019 are far too sensitive to CO2 emission. The report uses an extremely high emissions forecast that has near zero change of occurring. There is no evidence that warming will lead to more extreme weather. The report is a political document without any basis in reality.

Trump Transition Will be a Tsunami Washing Away Climate Corruption

Dr. Tim Ball says several event should have exposed the great deception of the claim that human-caused CO2 with cause catastrophic climate change before now. An IPCC report approved by scientists was drastically altered before it was released. The climategate emails that exposed malfeasance, collusion, and manipulation of data, should have stopped the corruption, but it didn’t. He says the recent election of Donald Trump will eliminate the climate corruption. He will likely advocate withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.

A Major Deception on Global Warming

Key changes were made to the IPCC's Second Assessment Report (SAR) on climate change after the scientists had met and accepted what they thought was the final peer-reviewed version. Frederick Seitz writes, "In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community ... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report." Nearly all of the changes removed the skepticism with which many scientists regard claims that human activities are having a major impact on climate in general and on global warming in particular.

Infiltration: The Effect of Condoning Psychologically Intimidating Language in a Climate Science Peer-reviewed Journal

Vested interests and professional positioning have led a long-term attack on dissenting views on climate change. Various psychological intimidation tactics have been employed (name-calling, bullying) to denigrate and isolate researchers whose views and research dispute the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports. In most areas of science, new perspectives are welcomed and discussed in a collegial manner. The author examines a case study of a recent peer-reviewed paper in climate science, “Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community” Lewandowsky, Oreskes et al (2015), in which disparaging words have infiltrated peer-reviewed works thus becoming officially condoned as an acceptable part of the scientific language.

Black Swans: An essay by Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen

This essay by Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen describes the politics and the abusive philosophy of science as practised by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its creations. The UN is using climate change as a tool to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution. The UN's real agenda is concentrated political authority. The theory of catastrophic man-made global warming has been falsified several times, but these “falsifications” have been totally ignored. It was once thought that “All swans are white” until a black swan was discovered.

web design & development by: