Global Temperatures Global Troposphere Temperatures click here For full size []]
Providing Insight
Into Climate Change
FoS Extracts - 2020

By: Ian Cameron                 TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

2020-09-12

 

Population Panic Lets Rich People Off the Hook

The Guardian's George Monbiot takes little comfort from a report in The Lancet that forecasts that continuing declines in fertility (due to trends in female education) will slow global population growth below the replacement rate. Mr. Monbiot worries that a smaller, but more affluent, population will still have a worse environmental impact, according to his equation: Impact = Population x Affluence x Technology (I = PAT). Current population growth is concentrated among the world's poorest people, who currently have little A or T.

Mr. Monbiot savages the affluent for (a) their environmental impact and (b) blaming that impact on the population of the poor. He omits to mention that most "solutions" to climate change tend to impact the poorest populations most.

 

Why Deaths From Hurricanes And Other Natural Disasters Are Lower Than Ever

Despite climate change being blamed by activists and the mainstream media whenever a hurricane strikes, Michael Shellenberger, author of Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All, provides evidence that: (1) hurricanes aren't increasing in frequency and (2) natural disaster deaths are at their lowest point in a century. The American Meteorological Society published a report in 2018 on landfalling hurricanes in the continental US between 1900 and 2017. The report found that there has been a slight downward trend in annual numbers of hurricanes. Though there has been an inflation-adjusted increase hurricane damage, this is due to increased exposure (more structures built in the hurricanes' paths), as opposed to increasing frequency or intensity of storms.

Mr. Schellenberger’s article includes a chart of global deaths per decade (1900-09 to 2010-19) from natural disasters, showing a 92% decline in decadal death toll since the peak in the 1920s.

 

Solar Energy Projects Face Extinction as Subsidies Run Out

In 2021 the 20-year feed-in contracts for 18,000 solar operators in Germany will expire. These operators, private households and small businesses, could be disconnected from the grid unless the Renewable Energy Subsidy (EEG) is renewed. In addition, they will no longer have the right to feed excess power to the grid. As of January, anyone who gives electricity to the grid for free will be liable to prosecution, so the operators would have to market their power through intermediaries. The photovoltaic industry is hoping that the federal government will approve new EEG subsidies in the autumn.

 

Power Companies "Hindering" the Move to Renewables

According to the BBC, new research suggests that power companies are dragging their feet in moving to green energy sources such as wind and solar. The research was published by Nature Energy as A global analysis of the progress and failure of electric utilities to adapt their portfolios of power-generation assets to the energy transition. The study looked at 3,000 utilities worldwide, quantifying their transition from fossil fuels to renewables over the past two decades. Using a machine-learning-based clustering algorithm with a historical global asset-level dataset the researcher distilled macro-behaviors and sub-patterns within them.

It turns out that 3/4 of the utilities did not expand their portfolios and a handful of the rest grew coal ahead of other assets, while half favored gas and the rest renewables. According to the author: "If you look at all utilities, and what's the dominant behaviour, it is that they're not doing much in fossil fuels and renewables." The overall conclusion from the analysis, though, is that utility companies are "hindering" the global transition to renewables.

 

Are Forests The New Coal? Global Alarm Raised over Biomass Burning

The forest biomass industry is sprawling and spreading globally - even as forest ecologists and climatologists warn that the industry is putting the planet’s temperate and tropical forests at risk, and they are aggressively lobbying governments against using wood pellets as a “renewable energy” alternative to burning coal. According to the environmental director of the Science Advisory Council of the European Academies: "We have repeatedly pointed out that… the large-scale substitution of coal by forest biomass [to produce electricity] will accelerate climate warming and will increase the risks of overshooting Paris [Climate Agreement] targets. The reason is simple: when the forest is harvested and used for bioenergy, all the carbon in the biomass enters the atmosphere very quickly, but it will not be reabsorbed by new trees for decades. This is not compatible with the need to tackle the climate crisis urgently."

Forest experts have argued that the carbon released by burning wood pellets would be offset by the replanting of new trees. However, such carbon neutrality takes 50 to 100 years. The biomass industry, in statements and scientific reports, argues that it is a green climate-friendly alternative to burning coal.

German mainstream media are finally waking up to what a Swiss meteorologist calls "the dumbest energy and environmental policy ever." Germany's flagship ARD public broadcaster reported how satellite images show deforestation has risen 49% since 2016 in Sweden, Finland and the Baltic countries. The reason: to meet CO2 targets by the harvesting of trees to make wood pellets.

 

UNFCCC Pushes Alarmist Lies About Its Own Science

On August 24 the UN released the Framework Convention on Climate Change's 2019 Annual Report, celebrating "25 years of global climate effort." In the forward UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres claims that the UNFCCC's activities were overwhelmed by "… the continued intensification of the pattern of destruction and losses associated with climate change …" and that "… going beyond a 1.5 °C increase in average surface temperature will lead us to catastrophic disaster and extreme weather events." Yet the IPCC, itself a creature of the UNFCCC, states in Chapter 3 of its 2018 SREX Report that there is "low confidence" in:

  • Observed trends in small-scale phenomena such as tornadoes and hail because of data inhomogeneities and inadequacies in monitoring systems.
  • At the global scale regarding even the sign of these changes [floods].
  • For the attribution of any detectable changes in tropical cyclone activity to anthropogenic influences.
  • Projections of changes in extreme winds.
  • Projections of small-scale phenomena such as tornadoes because competing physical processes may affect future trends and because climate models do not simulate such phenomena.
  • The detailed geographical projections of mid-latitude cyclone activity.
  • Projections of changes in monsoons (rainfall, circulation), because there is little consensus in climate models regarding the sign of future change in the monsoons.
  • Projections of changes n El Niño- Southern Oscillation variability and the frequency of El Niño episodes as a consequence of increased greenhouse gas concentrations.
  • Wave height projections.
  • Projections of changes in fluvial floods.
  • Projections of drought changes.

 

The Green, Green Road to Energy Blackouts

California leads the way to "green" electricity blackouts, followed closely by South Australia. They created the problem by eschewing reliable coal, nuclear, gas or hydro generators while subsidizing and promoting unreliable electricity from wind and solar. The latter two will always be prone to blackouts for three reasons:

  • They are intermittent, producing zero power when winds drops or sunlight fails.
  • Because they are dilute they require huge collection areas of land, connected by a fragile network of roads and transmission lines. Conventional power plants are centrally-located, requiring less transmission lines and are more resistant to weather damage.
  • When wind and solar power fails, the alternatives are:
    • Backup thermal or hydro power generation.
    • Power rationing.
    • Big batteries, themselves big consumers of energy in mining, materials, construction and charging/discharging.

 

Extinction Rebellion’s Plan For Eco-Soviets

In Britain Extinction Rebellion is pushing for a Climate and Ecological Emergency bill to be put before Parliament. The CEE Act would create a Citizens' Assembly with the power to force the government to implement any policy, except disbursement of public funds and taxation. Such an assembly could, for example, impose an immediate ban on the sale and use of gasoline and diesel fuels, or make flying illegal. The bill is quiet about who would sit on the Citizens' Assembly, except that its members would not be elected. Likely it would be dominated by the most extreme of the climate activists.

Following an Extinction Rebellion blockade of newspaper printing plants in London the UK government is threatening to change the law to make XR a criminal gang, including new protections for MPs, judges and the press. The UK Home Secretary said: “the activists should ‘sface the full force of the law’ for pursuing ‘guerrilla tactics... that seek to undermine and cause damage to our society.”

 

2020-08-20

 

California's Blackouts Expose "Clean" Energy Problems

Last fall California's power grid operator warned of coming electricity shortages as the state continues to shift from gas to wind and solar. In mid-August that warning proved true as the first rolling blackouts since 2001 cut power to hundreds of thousands in the state. California is awash with natural gas but charges more than twice the national median for electricity.

Though the cost of solar panels declined dramatically between 2011 and 2019, that didn't help when demand for power held steady after sunset. There has been very little electricity from wind during the summer heatwave. To manage the increasingly unreliable grid, California will either need to keep its nuclear plant operating, build more natural gas plants, or pay ever more money annually to reserve emergency electricity supplies from its neighbors.

According the US Energy Information Agency, California has adequate power generation capacity of 76 GW, but 27 GW of that is solar and 6 GW is wind. In August solar output declines after 4 PM and ends completely at 7 PM. The state is mandating a shift to all-electric medium and heavy-duty trucks in 2024 with the goal of reaching 100% of all new sales, wherever feasible, by 2045. 

At a press conference on August 17 the state's governor, Gavin Newscom, admitted that the shift from fossil fuel products to solar and other forms of green energy had led to "gaps" in the grid's reliability, but refused to back down and insisted that that the transition from fossil fuels is a “moral and ethical imperative." The Institute for Energy Research, in an analysis of the situation, concluded: "California’s blackouts are a product of its politically-determined reliance on intermittent, unreliable renewable energy, not a product of heatwave."

 

Vanity Is Driving Government Spending in Canada

As writer Matthew Lau argues in a Financial Post article, the issue of global warming has been a fabulous bonanza for Canadian politicians interested in spending other people's money and telling them how to live. Both environment ministers in the current government have said that said that spending and regulations are the expensive way to deal with climate change, and that a tax would be more efficient. However, climate-change spending at the federal environment ministry has increased from $106 million in 2015-16 to a planned $845 million in 2020-21.

While it would be more sensible to leave control over how and how much to reduce emissions to individuals and businesses, there's no glory in it for the politicians. Better to make repeated announcements of ambitious new programs and handouts to progressive, forward-thinking and environmentally conscious organizations who will respond gratefully to the government largess. Unfortunately for the taxpayers this vanity makes for wasteful government spending.

 

Beware of Green Stimulus

Bjørn Lomborg notes that the world will be spending trillions of dollars to recover from the ravages of the pandemic, with demands from campaigners and influential policy-makers to tie this spending to climate goals. These people tell us that a green recovery can create jobs and economic growth, and will also deal with the bigger problem of climate change. While Mr. Lomborg accepts that climate change is a problem for humanity, climate-change policies have massive costs which outweigh the benefits. In the case of the 2050 European Green Deal the cost is €1-2 trillion/year, which exceeds what EU governments spend today on health, education and environment.

Regarding jobs, in the US it takes 39 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as one worker in natural gas. The subsidized green jobs will have to be financed by higher taxes. An OECD study shows that climate policies drag down growth, while smart non-climate investments in infrastructure and education, with a more flexible labour market, increase growth.

 

CLINTEL Issues Great Charter of Universities for Research Freedom

The climate change debate might be one of the worst cases of academic suppression in history, so CLINTEL has issued a Magna Carta Universitatum 2020. This document begins with a preamble that describes what universities are supposed to be and do, but are now becoming suppressors of alternate views opposed by their funders, supported by ideological and political groups. It then lists five statements of general applicability, with a climate example for each.

 

Peter Ridd to Appeal Court Ruling

Peter Ridd is a marine geophysicist and Great Barrier Reef expert whose 30-year academic career ended when he started disputing the conventional wisdom that climate change was “killing” the reef. He took his employer, James Cook University, to court, wining $1.2 million in compensation. JCU appealed, and the Federal Court overturned the decision in a 2-1 ruling, with the majority noting: “There is little to be gained in resorting to historical concepts of academic freedom." This case shows how much public institutions have been corroded by cancel culture.

However, Dr. Ridd has vowed to fight on by appealing to the High Court of Australia.

 

Irish Supreme Court Orders Government to Strengthen Climate Plan

On July 31 the Supreme Court of Ireland upheld a legal challenge brought by Friends of the Irish Environment contending that the government's 2017 climate cation plan breached legislation requiring the state to specify its proposals. The chief justice wrote in the judgement that there was "… a clear present statutory obligation on the government, in formulating a plan, to at least give some realistic level of detail." During proceedings the government argued that the legal challenge amounted to a challenge of its policy decisions which are “not within the scope of questions which can properly be the subject of litigation."

While the court can order the government to produce a plan, can it force members of the Irish Parliament to pass legislation needed to implement it?

 

Australian Labor Party Split Emerges over Green Energy

Having lost the un-loseable election in May last year, an angry rump of Australian Labour backbenchers is keen to ditch the party’s suicidal renewable energy policies. With Australian businesses suffering among the world’s highest power prices, thanks to its obsession with intermittent wind and solar, South Australian households and businesses suffer the highest prices in the world, the rebirth of manufacturing and industry sounds like so much wishful thinking.

Labour MP Joel Fitzgibbon has accused the party's influential internal environment lobby of putting blue-collar jobs and lower energy prices at risk – and warned them against exaggerating the number of jobs in the renewable energy sector – as the party’s split over climate and energy policy grows. Mt. Fitzgibbon said the Labor Environment Action Network’s “fundamentalist” policies were out of step with ALP values and making the party unelectable.

 

Exclusive Poll: Amid Covid-19, Americans Don’t Care About Climate Change Anymore

Last December in a Harris poll American adults said climate change was the number one issue facing society. In a survey conducted on July 24 it came second last on a list of 12 options, ahead of only overpopulation. Covid-19 and the resulting recession have reordered priorities around the world.

 

The Dirty Secrets of "Clean" Electric Vehicles

The widespread view that fossil fuels are “dirty” and renewables such as wind and solar energy and electric vehicles are “clean” has become a fixture of mainstream media and policy assumptions across the political spectrum in developed countries. However, most important component in the EV is the lithium-ion rechargeable battery which relies on critical mineral commodities such as cobalt, graphite, lithium, and manganese. Tracing the source of these minerals, in what is called “full-cycle economics”, it becomes apparent that EVs create a trail of dirt from the mining and processing of minerals upstream.

A recent United Nations report warns that the raw materials used in electric car batteries are highly concentrated in a small number of countries where environmental and labour regulations are weak or non-existent. Thus, battery production for EVs is driving a boom in small-scale or “artisanal” cobalt production in the Democratic Republic of Congo which supplies two thirds of global output of the mineral. These artisanal mines, which account for up to a quarter of the country’s production, have been found to be dangerous and employ child labour.

According to Professor Kelly of Cambridge University, if we replace all of the UK vehicle fleet with EVs,  assuming they use the most resource-frugal next-generation batteries, we would need the following materials: about twice the annual global production of cobalt; three quarters of the world’s production lithium carbonate; nearly the entire world production of neodymium; and more than half the world’s production of copper in 2018.

 

50% Of The EU’s ‘Climate Budget’ Will be Given To Farmers, Critics Warn

The EU has committed to spending 30% of the bloc's budget on climate change — 10 percentage points higher than the 2014-20 budget. This works out to €600 billion. It turns out, however, that half that amount won't be spent on reducing CO2 emissions, but on the EU's Common Agriculture Policy. A spokesperson for the European Environmental Bureau, a network of various environmental groups, calls this "massive greenwashing." A huge portion of the money will be paid directly to farmers to support their income.

 

IPCC to Delay Release of Next Climate Science Report

Before the Covid-19 pandemic the IPCC planned to release its sixth climate assessment (AR6) according to the following timetable:

  • April 2021 - Working Group I - the physical science.
  • September 2021 - Working Group II - mitigation of climate change
  • October 2021 - Working Group III - impacts, adaptation and vulnerability

 This timetable was intended to have all three parts ready before the start of COP26 (climate summit in Glasgow) in November 2021 but had a footnote that the dates were likely to shift as a result of the pandemic. Climate Change News confirms the shift, reporting that only the WG I report will be released before COP26.

 

Climate-change Hysteria Costs Lives — But Activists Want to Keep the Panic Alive

Michael Shellenberger, author of Apocalypse Never, expected his book to be controversial, but was taken aback when CNN’s top climate reporter compared it to a cigarette advertisement and an environmental journalist accused Mr. Shellenberger of promoting "white supremacy." Last year he decided to speak out when it became clear that climate alarmism was harming mental health. (A survey of 30,000 people around the world found that nearly half believed that climate change would make humanity extinct.)

Despite evidence to the contrary, some alarmists claim that climate change is making disasters worse. The reason: so they can use the world’s most visual and dramatic events, from Hurricane Sandy to California’s forest fires, to make the issue more salient with voters. It's also about power. Elites have used climate alarmism to justify efforts to control food and energy policies in their home nations and around the world for more than three decades. And it gives them purpose: to save the world from climate change.

 

2020-07-23

 

Climate Lawsuits Worldwide

The London School of Economics’ Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment published Global trends in climate change litigation: 2020 snapshot on July 3. According to Table 1.1 (p. 6) of the report, English-speaking countries tend to attract the most climate lawsuits. For the period 1986 to May 2020 there were 1,587 of these cases, of which the US has had 1,213, followed by Australia (98), the UK (62), the EU (57), Canada (22), New Zealand (18), Spain (13), France (11) and the IPCC (10). Thirty-six other jurisdictions and international agencies shared the remaining 83 cases. Figures 1.1 (a) to (c) show big jumps in the number of cases since 2000.

Over 80% of the cases outside the US have been brought against governments by corporations or individuals. Human rights arguments are being used to support an increasing number of cases, and various strategies are being used against fossil-fuel companies, The biggest win for litigants has been the Urgenda case in the Netherlands (Box 2.1) where on December 20, 2019 the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the state, despite emitting only 0.4% of global emissions, has to "reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its territory in proportion to its share of the responsibility."

Another big case to watch is Juliana v. United States, where 21 children assert that their government is violating their constitutional rights by allowing dangerous CO2 concentrations. After a panel of the Ninth Circuit of the US Court of Appeal ruled in January that, despite agreeing with the plaintiffs on causation, the issue is a matter for legislation, not litigation. The plaintiffs have filed an appeal to have the case heard by a full panel of 11 circuit court judges.

The Grantham Research Institute publishes a database of climate litigation, which can be searched by country, date started, date of last change and/or status. For each case there is a summary, followed by links to the case documents.

 

Ridd Case: Federal Court Delivers Blow to Free Speech in Australia

The Federal Court of Australian overturned an earlier ruling of the Federal Circuit Court, which held that Dr. Peter Ridd had been unlawfully dismissed from his post at James Cook University over his views challenging orthodox climate change science and the Great Barrier Reef. Dr. Ridd may appeal the latest decision to the High Court of Australia. Jennifer Marohasy, writing in The Spectator Australia, relates the history of Dr. Ridd's fight with JCU since 2018, concluding: "Today’s decision means that James Cook University, and other Australian universities, will continue to crush dissent and sack academics who campaign for the truth."

 

The EU's "Climate Bank"

At the end of 2019, to much fanfare, the European Investment Bank announced its plan to become the "EU Climate Bank," eschewing investments in fossil-fuel projects and aligning itself with the objectives of the Paris Agreement by the end of 2020. Alas, Counter Balance, a coalition of nine NGOs has published a damning report on the EIB called The  EU Climate Bank — Greenwashing or a banking revolution? The report begins: "As of today [June 2020], the EIB still supports numerous environmentally and socially detrimental projects, especially in the energy and transport sectors." 

From 2016 to 2019 the EIB provided €28.7 billion to "dirty" projects — maritime, motorways, airports, coal utilities and fossil fuels. When it announced its new lending policy in November 2019 the EIB gave itself three important exceptions that could allow it to invest in what the report calls "fossil gas" projects. In mid-June the bank approved loans for a gas terminal in Cyprus and a pipeline between Bulgaria and Serbia. It is still considering major investments in airports and motorways. Justifications for such projects typically use terms like "green or low carbon gas" and "green aviation" (i.e., more efficient aircraft, biofuels and emissions offsets.)

 

East European Nations Reject New EU Climate Targets

The European Union has pledged to reduce CO2 emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, a target that some scientists say is too low prevent catastrophic global warming. Thus, the European Commission will propose a 50-55% cut in September, but it needs approval by the member states and the European Parliament. A two-day virtual meeting of environmental ministers ended on July 14 and failed to find common ground on whether to even raise the target. Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Czech Republic and Hungary said they would not support a new target without seeing an impact assessment. In a letter to the Commission they wrote: "We would like to avoid a situation where we are left wondering what the real social, environmental and economic costs for us are all."

Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, Austria and Luxembourg support an emissions cut of at least 55% by 2030.

 

EU Leaders Slash Climate Budget in Coronavirus Recovery Package

After four days of wrangling EU heads of government agreed on a €750 billion package aimed at funding post-pandemic efforts to revive Europe’s economies. However, the package slashed the size of the EU's Just Transition Fund from €37.5 billion to €17.5 billon. The JTF is a pot of money intended to wean countries off fossil fuels. To access the money, countries must commit to become “climate neutral” by 2050 — a condition aimed squarely at Poland. Nevertheless, Poland will receive €125 billion in EU grants over the next seven years without changing its climate stance.

 

UN Body Endorses Aviation Industry Proposal on Emissions Offsets

Following lobbying by the airline industry's International Air Transport Association, the UN's International Civil Aviation Organization, has agreed to ease airlines' obligation to offset their emissions growth. The agreed baseline for measuring emissions was to have been the two-year average of 2019 and 2020. However, with the collapse of air travel in 2020 the IATA requested, and the ICAO agreed, to change the baseline to 2019 for the first three years of CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation). As a result, if the industry's emissions don't rise above 2019 levels during these three years (2021-23) airlines won't have to pay anything.

In 2022 the ICAO will decide whether continue the baseline change beyond 2023 or revert back to the earlier 2019-20 average.

 

Greta Thunberg Demands Response to "Climate Crisis" Now

On July 16 Greta Thunberg issued a string of demands for world leaders to take emergency action on climate change, lamenting that some had “given up” on the possibility of preparing a decent future for coming generations. In an open letter to EU and global leaders, Ms. Thunberg and fellow activists are demanding:

  • Ending all fossil-fuel investments and subsidies immediately.
  • Making ecocide an international crime at the International Criminal Court.
  • Including total emissions in international shipping and aviation.
  • Establishing, starting today, annual binding carbon budgets based on the IPCC's budget that fives a 66% chance of limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
  • Safeguarding and protecting democracy.
  • Designing climate policies that protect the most vulnerable and reduce all forms of inequality, economic, racial and gender.
  • Treating the climate and ecological emergency like an emergency.

In a Reuters interview Ms. Thunberg said "We need to see it as, above all, an existential crisis. And as long as it’s not being treated as a crisis, we can have as many of these climate change negotiations and talks, conferences as possible. It won’t change a thing."

 

New Prediction of Polar Bear Extinction

On July 20 Nature Climate Change published a paper titled Fasting season sets temporal limits for global polar bear persistence, that used an ensemble of climate models to estimate the increasing number of days/year that polar bear subpopulations will have to fast due to global warming. The authors conclude that, with high greenhouse gas emissions, the survival of all but a few high-Arctic subpopulations by 2100 will be in jeopardy. Mainstream media, including the BBC, the CBC and the NY Times, all issued uncritical accounts of the paper's conclusions the same day. The ENGO Polar Bears International produced a 4-minute video stating that we have to rapidly decrease our reliance on fossil fuels and make a swift transition to renewable energy to save the bears.

However, zoologist Susan Crockford was just as quick as the media and the ENGO to publish in her blog a report critiquing the model used by the Nature Climate Change authors. They relied on the worst-case RCP8.5 scenario [FoS Extracts - 2010-07-02] which is totally implausible, as even the BBC has admitted. Also, the paper uses polar bear data collected up to 2009 only from Western Hudson's Bay to predict the response of bears worldwide. In fact, polar bear populations worldwide continue to thrive, despite declines in sea ice.

 

2020-07-02

 

Green Activist Apologizes for the Climate Scare

Michael Shellenberger has been an environmental activist since age 16. In his 30s he advocated for renewables, helping to persuade the Obama administration to invest $90 billion in them, and earned a "Hero of the Environment" accolade from Time Magazine. For years he referred to climate change as an "existential" threat to human civilization and called it a "crisis." That is now all in the past as Mr. Shellenberger has decided to speak out in his new book: Apocalypse Never: Why Environmentalism Hurts Us All. In this article that he wrote for Climate Change Dispatch, he says that, while climate change is happening, it's not the end of the world or even our most serious environmental problem.

Mr. Shallenberger lists 12 facts about climate change that few people know; he admits standing by and remaining quiet about the climate disinformation campaign for fear of losing friends and funding. In the past year the disinformation from prominent activists and the mainstream media became so strident and fear-inducing that he decided to lay out all the evidence in Apocalypse Never, which he calls "my formal apology for our fear-mongering."

In a Sky News Australia video Mr. Shellenberger relates how the conservation movements that existed until about 1970 were taken over by a Malthusian, left-wing, anti-human tradition. Climate change has morphed from an environmental concern into a new morality about not eating meat, not using plastic, not driving and not flying. Climate alarmism has been hurting adolescents in particular, especially girls like Greta Thunberg. The greens have been so successful that they convinced the World Bank to stop funding development, in effect making poverty sustainable rather than making it history.

Forbes, apparently slow to recognize Mr. Shellenberger's apostasy, initially published an article by him on the book and then took it down. Last year Forbes did the same thing when it removed an interview with Professor Nir Shaviv, who describes what happened.

 

Facebook Oversight Board Asked To Censor Climate Skeptic Posts

A group of prominent environmentalists and Democratic activists (including one Canadian, Gerald Butts, former principal secretary to Justin Trudeau) has sent a letter with the title Facebook must stop the spread of climate misinformation to the Facebook Oversight Board, which is headed by former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt. The group accuses Facebook of "allowing the spread of climate misinformation to flourish, unchecked, across the globe" and siding with fossil-fuel lobbyists, instead of heeding the advice of independent scientists and approved fact-checkers. It castigates Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for refusing to "recognize that he must get the facts right on climate."

The activist group specifically targets Facebook's distribution of content from CO2 Coalition without any warning, labels or restrictions

 

COVID vs. Climate Models: Cloudy with a Chance of Politics

An article in Climate Change Dispatch compares the recent use of statistical models used to predict the spread of the coronavirus contagion with climate models. The statistical models proved to be spectacularly wrong, leading to emergency rooms and hospital beds that were prepared for the pandemic and then being left empty. The New York Times ran a story about a report based on computer modelling by the Imperial College in London that warned of 510,000 Covid deaths in Britain and 2.2 million in the US.

Scientific American, alarmed that "climate science deniers" were exploiting the failure of the coronavirus models, rushed to the models' defense. SciAm reasons that the dire projections of Covid-related deaths scared people into taking action, like social distancing, thus saving lives.

 

The Flaw in Relying on Worst-Case-Scenario Climate Modelling

Media stories about looming climate disaster if we continue "business as usual" almost always refer to computer simulations using an emissions scenario known as RCP8.5. This stands for a "representative concentration pathway" with 8.5 W/m2 of radiative forcing resulting from an atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching over 1200 ppm by 2100. (It is currently about 410 ppm.) RCP8.5 is just one of four scenarios used by the IPCC in its last assessment report, AR5, the others being RCPs 2.6, 4.5 and 6.0.

As Ross McKitrick explains, RCP 2.6 is a benign, low-end emissions scenario, while RCPs 4.5 and 6.0 are in the middle. The International Energy Agency expects global coal use, which rose to 23 GJ per capita earlier this decade, to fall to 15-20 GJ per capita by 2040. RCP8.5 requires per capita coal consumption to be 30 GJ by 2040, 45 GJ by 2060 and 70 GJ by 2100. A recent study from the University of Colorado found a contradiction in the RCP8.5 scenario: It assumes that in 2100 today's poor countries will be richer than the wealthiest ones are now; but that's impossible if they've become uninhabitable wastelands by then.

Thus, RCP8.5 is an implausible worst-case scenario, not business as usual. Modellers prefer it because it gets more media attention than any more realistic alternative.

 

EU Made ‘No Progress’ In Climate Action Over Past Five Years

A report by the EU's statistics office, Eurostat, indicates that progress on the bloc's climate and energy targets have stalled over the past five years. The EU has 17 Sustainable Development Goals. While there has been progress on almost all of them, Nos. 7 (affordable and clean energy) and 13 (climate action) have been lagging. For No. 7, energy consumption and dependency were the lagging indicators, while for No. 13 they were greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 emissions from new cars, ocean acidity, surface temperatures and climate-related economic losses.

Meanwhile, there is an East vs. West split in the EU over a higher Green Deal target, specifically whether 2030 emissions should be increased from 40% to 50% or 55% below 1990 levels. Eight countries (Finland, Austria, Luxembourg, Latvia, Denmark, Estonia, the Netherlands and Sweden) are urging the higher targets. Bulgaria, Slovakia and Poland are opposed.

 

African Lives Matter, Too

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the International Energy Agency have recently hailed the low oil prices caused by the pandemic as a "golden opportunity" for governments to phase out support for fossil fuels in favour of renewables. However, NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the African Energy Chamber, has a different view. According to Mr. Ayuk: "… the OECD and IEA don’t necessarily know what’s best for the people who live on this planet. Pressuring governments to stop supporting fossil fuels certainly would not be good for the African oil and gas companies or entrepreneurs striving to build a better future. And it could be downright harmful to communities looking at gas-to-power initiatives to bring them reliable electricity."

"Too often, the discussion about climate change — and the call to leave fossil fuels in the ground— is largely a western narrative. It does not factor in the needs of low-income Africans who could reap the many benefits of a strategic approach to oil and gas operations in Africa: reduced energy poverty, job creation, and entrepreneurship opportunities, to name a few."

Mr. Ayuk points out that 840 million Africans have no access to electricity and the deaths from indoor air pollution caused by burning biomass for cooking and heating. Only 28% of Africa's health-care facilities have reliable power. While he is all for renewable energy solutions, Mr. Ayuk says Africans should not be forced to make either-or decisions, particularly when there are vast African natural gas reserves for power generation.

 

The Gruesome Human Cost of Renewable Energy

Renewable energy advocates are facing uncomfortable questions about the source and disposition of raw materials needed for the green revolution.  Making all the solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles requires copper, lithium and cobalt, which like fossil fuels, are extracted from the ground. But, unlike fossil fuels, these raw materials come disproportionally from developing countries. Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has come under attack due to human rights abuses (through use of child labour) and environmental degradation.

Renewable technologies have ethical issues at both ends of their life cycle. Ghana is a global cemetery for reprocessing electronics such as solar panels. These panels often contain lead, cadmium and other toxic materials. By 2050, the rough expiry date of solar panels manufactured today, they will have become 78 million tonnes of waste, or 80% more than the total annual waste from all combined technologies today.

 

The Heartland of America Is Clearly Benefiting from Climate Change

James Taylor of The Heartland Institute responds to a Chicago speaker who was giving a talk titled: Climate Change Is Disrupting America’s Heartland: What We Can Do About It and What We (maybe) Can’t. This talk warned of climate change-related impacts to agriculture due to flooding, drought, insects. Mr. Taylor examines each of these, citing objective data, evidence and facts. Regarding floods, even the IPCC expressed "low confidence" in any climate change impact, and the Hydrological Sciences Journal found no such effect, either. As documented by Climate at a Glance, the US is benefitting from fewer and less extreme drought events.

Climate alarmists like to claim global warming causes more insects that are harmful to crops, and more recently a decline in insect populations that also damages crops. However, recent global and US crop yields have been setting new records, and the longer growing seasons and more atmospheric CO2 are creating ideal crop conditions.

 

New German Study: E-Cars ‘Actually Exacerbate Global Warming’

A study in Germany found that electric cars are "far from being climate-friendly.” The reason is that most of the electricity in that country is generated from fossil fuels, mainly coal. This situation will continue as long as fossil fuels in the electricity mix remain above 20%. The EU Commission estimates that the fossil fuel share will still be about 40% in 2050.

 

2020-06-16

 

Alarmist Queen Hayhoe Takedown by Friends of Science

Last year high-profile climate scientist Dr. Katherine Hayhoe delivered a doomsday forecast, titled Alberta's Climate Future, Friends of Science has just produced a 77-page rebuttal, Facts vs Fortune Telling, shredding Dr. Hayhoe’s study in detail. David Wojick, an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy, writing for CFACT, praises the FoS rebuttal. He notes that the Hayhoe report used truncated trends, ignores the fact that different climate models give wildly different regional projections, and relied on "downscaling" of hot climate models.  Dr. Wojick concludes: "The Friends of Science takedown is a model for critical analysis of alarmist pseudoscientific hype. The deeply flawed Hayhoe report is not unusual. On the contrary it is typical of climate alarmism — computer based, on selected data, presenting speculative scary conclusions as facts."

 

Greta Thunberg Looks to UN Security Council Election for Leverage on Climate

On June 17 Canada, Ireland and Norway will be competing in a vote for two non-permanent seats on the UN Security Council. Though Canada and Norway have promised to address climate change as a threat to peace and stability, group of four youth activists led by Greta Thunberg thinks that both countries' support for oil and gas production is incompatible with international climate goals. Accordingly, the activists, together with 22 climate scientists, have signed a letter addressed to small island states raising “grave concerns” about the Arctic nations’ policies to expand and subsidize fossil fuel extraction. “If Norway and Canada are serious about our climate security, they should commit to no new fossil fuel exploration or extraction and begin phasing down their domestic production at a pace that is consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C.” (Apparently the activists have no issue with Ireland.)

Michael Mann added his support saying: "Pleased to join @GretaThunberg and other climate advocates in raising “grave concerns” about Arctic

 

Profits Count More Than Ever, Not Corporate Virtue-Signaling

An article in Fortune magazine predicts that the public will expect corporations operating with government money as the economy recovers from the coronavirus pandemic to use the money "for the benefit of society at large." An Ernst & Young report notes there will be increased public pressure on companies “to proactively address societal challenges, from income inequality to climate change.” And the Trudeau government is using its “Large Employer Emergency Financing Facility” program to browbeat businesses into declaring their support for “environmental sustainability and national climate goals.” 

As Matthew Lau argues in an article from the Financial Post, the problem with tasking corporations to address climate change, or any other in a long list of public issues, is that corporations are still owned by shareholders and should maximize profits for their owners. The recovery from the pandemic must be led by the private-sector hiring and capital investment. The idea that corporations should focus on "social" goals assumes that profit-maximizing implies that they are operating to the detriment of workers and consumers. Holding them responsible for climate change wastes resources at a time when we are trying to recover from the worst downturn in generations.

 

Australian Companies Will Be Paid to Use Less Electricity

When the grid is under strain, rather than paying electricity generators to increase supply, the Australian Energy Market Commission wants to pay large users for cutting consumption under a scheme called "wholesale demand response." These users will bid for reductions in demand. The AMEC argues that the scheme will allow prices and improve reliability by allowing demand response to compete with "peaking" generators who typically receive high prices for their power.

Joanne Nova writes that the demand response scheme is another renewables tax hidden in complexity. The grid is now incapable of providing regular, reliable electricity whenever it's most useful to companies, and so the government is adding a new layer of complexity to try and squeeze out the price spikes.

 

German Authorities Cracking Down on "Climate Change Dissent"

In an 8:36 video teenager Naomi Seibt (dubbed the "anti-Greta") tells Sky News Australia tells how she got a letter from the German state media authorities telling her to take down three of her videos because they were not "climate friendly" and for breaking product placement law (she posted one of the videos on behalf of the Heartland Institute.) The state tactics remind her of the old German DDR. Ms. Seibt relates how climate change in Germany has been pushed aside by the coronavirus crisis, but now climate alarmists came back and are trying to abuse the crisis for their agenda. She feels that, with coronavirus and climate change, all over the world we are heading towards a more totalitarian society.

The issue is not those topics specifically, but how governments are abusing them to push tyranny and silence those of different opinion, like Ms. Seibt who try to explain climate science. Whenever she asks a climate activist about the science the answer is that 97% of scientists agree. Ms. Seibt was given three options to take down her videos, two of which were jail or a fine. She is refusing and is prepared to go to court. Ms. Seibt has more support abroad than in her native Germany.

Christopher Monckton offers Ms. Seibt a big thank you from the front line in the name of free speech. His piece in Watts Up With That describes in more detail Ms. Seibt's videos and her dealings with the State Media Authority in North Rhine Westphalia.

 

‘Planet Of The Humans’ EP Michael Moore & Director Jeff Gibbs Blast “Blatant Censorship” After Controversial Documentary Yanked From YouTube

After racking up more than 8.3 million views, Michael Moore and Jeff Gibbs' documentary Planet of the Humans was taken down from YouTube. [Apparently it is now available here.] The reason for the takedown: a copyright claim was lodged against the documentary over four seconds of footage it contains. The four-second clip subject to the copyright right claim comes 37 minutes into the documentary, in a sequence titled “How Solar Panels & Wind Turbines Are Made.” The footage shows a mining operation for rare earth metals, which are used in wind turbine manufacture. Mr. Gibbs said that he incorporated the footage under "fair use," an exception to copyright law that allows news reporters and documentary filmmakers limited access to copyrighted material.

In a statement Mr. Gibbs said: "This attempt to take down our film and prevent the public from seeing it is a blatant act of censorship by political critics of Planet of the Humans. It is a misuse of copyright law to shutdown a film that has opened a serious conversation about how parts of the environmental movement have gotten into bed with Wall Street and so-called “green capitalists.” There is absolutely no copyright violation in my film. This is just another attempt by the film’s opponents to subvert the right to free speech."

 

UN Climate Conference Delayed Until November 2021

In a letter to UN member states the UK proposes that the COP26 talks, which were originally to take place in Glasgow in November 2020 and then postponed because of the Covid-19 pandemic, could be moved to November 1-12, 2021. On May 28 the UN Climate Change bureau approved the proposal. This gives the conference hosts 18 months to press leaders into making stronger commitments, while planning to safeguard up to 30,000 attendees from the coronavirus.

 

EU Ditches Green Deal For Aviation Industry

In the wake of the global coronavirus pandemic, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), an airline industry organization, called on the UN body responsible for aviation (the International Civil Aviation Organization-ICAO) to ease airlines’ obligations to offset their emissions growth under a scheme known as Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme, or CORSIA. The object of CORSIA is to achieve "carbon-neutral" growth in CO2 emissions from 2021 onwards, using 2019 and 2020 figures as a baseline. The IATA proposes using only 2019 as the baseline, which could save airlines as much as $15 billion.

On June 9 EU member states backed the baseline change, which could see airlines paying no CORSIA fees for five years. Climate activists condemned the EU action. According to Gilles Dufrasne, senior policy officer at Carbon Market Watch: "This could be the final blow for CORSIA. It was always a ridiculously weak system, but now it is becoming essentially meaningless. Airlines are just let off the hook one more time." Jo Dardenne, aviation manager at NGO Transport & Environment, said the change in baseline meant "we’re going from a cheap offsetting scheme to no scheme at all." She added: "The aviation sector is clearly using the Covid-19 crisis to dilute the environmental effectiveness of a scheme that was already expected to bring little to zero environmental benefits,"

 

Germany’s Newest Coal Plant Opens

As protesters unfurled their banner along the canal beneath Germany's Datteln 4 coal-fired power plant opened last month. “It’s a climate crime, what’s happening here,” says Lisa Göldner, a Greenpeace activist, who added: "I see it as part of our job to send messages of hope. But I’m really frustrated when it comes to this. This feels like a lost battle." But in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, and with recession looming, the fight against the country’s coal lobby has been overshadowed.

 

2020-05-25

 

Civil War on the Left: Michael Moore vs. the Greens

Less than a week after release of Michael Moore's Planet of the Humans, activist Josh Fox (best known for the anti-fracking flic Gasland), climate scientist Michael Mann and others signed a petition asking the producer to take down the film. Films for Action initially complied with the request, but half a day later decided to put it back up "…  because we believe media literacy, critique and debate is the best solution to the misinformation in the film." Films for Action commented: "While the film makes many important points, we are disheartened and dismayed to report that the film is also full of misinformation."

Bill McKibben of 350.org, whom Planet of the Humans personally attacks for promoting forest-destroying biomass energy and engaging in green capitalism, calls it a "bomb in the center of the climate movement." In a long Rolling Stone article he defends his actions, describing Mr. Moore as one of a collection of showmen "… who enjoy attracting attention to themselves by endlessly picking fights," compared to "… people [like Mr. McKibben] who actually try to organize, to build power, to bring people together."

A Forbes article calls Planet of the Humans an anti-human film that ignores our need for affordable and reliable energy to survive, but also calls it important as it "… represents a rupture in left-leaning orthodoxy about energy and climate change." The outrage coming from the environmental left sounds like Greta Thunberg's "How dare you!" More sinister is the all-renewable-energy tribe's attempts to shut down debate and demonize the opposition through lawsuits.

 

Canada’s Cool-Headed Antidote To Hot Arctic Alarmism

According to Terence Corcoran, a new report by the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans "is a welcome, cool-headed antidote to the sensational portrayal of the Arctic as a melting disaster that's killing polar bears." The report, Canada's Oceans Now: Arctic Ecosystems 2019, was released on Earth Day, but received little attention apart from a news story that seized upon the statement: that Arctic Ocean waters are "33 per cent less salty than in 2003 and about 30 per cent more acidic — enough to dissolve the shells of some small mollusks." But it turns out that the 33% less salty body of water is part of the Beaufort Gyre where water circulates in a giant spin cycle causing salt levels to fluctuate. A lead author of the report said that the low-salt reference "does not apply to the entire Canadian Arctic."

Rather than portray the Canadian Arctic as a collapsing ecosystem facing climate disaster and species extinction, the report serves as a basis for serious science and social research into a dynamic non-static ever-changing environment. 

 

European Commission Rejects ‘Climate-Related Conditions’ for Covid-19 Recovery Aid

The European Commission, which approves state support schemes, updated its temporary rules on May 8 for firms receiving government aid during the pandemic. The new rules ban dividends, share buybacks and bonuses for bailed-out companies, for so long as the state holds a stake in them. However, the commissioners did not attach climate-related conditions to EU approvals of state aid—despite calls from lawmakers and green groups to do so - and instead leave it to national governments to choose to add “green strings” to bailouts. The Commission has already signed off on €1.9 billion on state support schemes for companies during the pandemic.

 

Without Subsidies Germany’s Solar Industry Could Implode This Summer

Germany's solar industry is collecting signatures and writing incendiary letters to politicians to finally abolish the solar cap and thus save thousands of jobs. According to the latest survey results of the German Solar Industry Association (BSW), the industry’s business expectation index has halved in just three months, and that’s not even due to the coronavirus. At present, Germany has solar plants with a capacity of 50.09 GW. However, once the 52 GW threshold is reached – probably as early as this summer – the cap will close. This means that smaller plants of up to 750 kW, which make up the majority of newly built plants, will then no longer be entitled to subsidies from the Renewable Energy Sources Act.  

Though there is broad public and political support for abolishing the cap, it has been stymied by a debate on the controversial distance rules between wind turbines and buildings, which the economy minister wanted to set at 1,000 m, to reduce countless civil lawsuits against the turbines. The distance debate has become a power game between the two parties forming Germany's coalition government. BSW boss Carsten Körnig is urging politicians to abolish the solar cap before the end of May, as he is threatening that otherwise there would be a “super climate policy disaster.”

 

Mexico Puts the Kibosh On Renewables

Mexico's National Energy Control Center, or Cenace, announced that it would suspend grid connections of new solar and wind farms until further notice. The motivation behind the decision was the intermittency of solar and wind power generation, which, according to the state-owned power market operator, could compromise Mexico’s energy security in difficult times. “The intermittent generation from wind and PV plants affects the reliability of the national electricity system, [impacting] the sufficiency, quality, and continuity of power supply,” Cenace wrote in a document setting out the rules of the country’s electricity market during the COVID-19 lockdown.

The stage is now set for yet another legal dispute between Mexico’s government and the renewables sector. The Mexican business council, the CCE, hit out at the changes, describing them as “lacking a solid technical rationale and a fully justified legal foundation”. By acting to block pre-operation tests for solar and wind, Cenace has neglected its duty to system efficiency, the CCE said. Labelling Cenace’s move as part of a broader roadmap of “regulatory capture” by Mexico’s government, the CCE added: “Like before, the private sector will take the necessary legal measures to preserve the level field and Mexicans' right to a healthy environment.”

 

Ambitious EU Climate Efforts Could Increase CO2 Emissions In The Rest Of The World, New Study Warns

A policy brief prepared by economists at the University of Copenhagen shows that the more the EU economy succeeds in dialing down emissions the more the rest of the world will turn them up. Using the EUCalc model the economists calculate a carbon leakage rate of 61.5% for the most ambitious EU decarbonization pathway. That is, for each tonne of CO2 emissions avoided by the EU, the rest of the world will increase its emissions by 0.615 t, resulting in a net reduction in emissions of 0.385 t, significantly delaying achieving the Paris Agreement targets.

In the most ambitious 2050 scenario a green transformation of CO2-intensive industries like concrete, steel and chemicals will increase the costs and prices of their products, making them uncompetitive with those from the US and China. In this case Europe would have to import the products, rather than manufacturing them. The economists conclude that the EU must formulate green strategies for each manufacturing sector and member state while encouraging other countries to pursue similar decarbonization strategies.

 

Bowing to Activists, Google Won’t Build AI Tools for Oil And Gas Drillers

On May 19 Google announced that it will no longer build custom artificial intelligence tools for speeding up oil and gas extraction, separating itself from cloud computing rivals Microsoft and Amazon. This follows a Greenpeace report that documents how the three tech giants are using AI and computing power to help oil companies find and access oil and gas deposits in the U.S. and around the world. Greenpeace says Amazon, Microsoft, and Google have been undermining their own climate change pledges by partnering with major oil companies including Shell, BP, Chevron, and ExxonMobil that have looked for new technology to get more oil and gas out of the ground. However, Greenpeace applauded Google's May 19 announcement.

 

Not Even the Global Covid-19 Disaster Will Make A Big Difference To Atmospheric CO2 Levels

Roy Spencer explains why even the current reduction in economic activity and emissions won't noticeably affect atmospheric CO2 levels. Global land and ocean areas emit about 30 times as much CO2 into the atmosphere as from human burning of fossil fuels. Moreover, the lands and oceans absorb about as much as they emit, as part of the global carbon cycle. Events such as El Niño (+), La Niña (-), wildfires and volcanic eruptions can perturb the carbon cycle balance. However, the most dramatic variations are the seasonal ones due to the Northern Hemisphere's cycle of vegetation growth in summer and decay in winter.

The US Energy Information Administration estimates that the current economic slowdown will cause an 11% reduction in global CO2 emissions this year. As Dr. Spencer shows graphically, there was no resulting atmospheric evidence of the emissions reduction in April. He estimates that the reduction would have to be 50% and prolonged for a year or more.

 

2020-04-27

 

Michael Moore Documentary Reveals Ecological Impact of Renewables

Michael Moore has produced a new, anti-human documentary, Planet of the Humans, which was released free on YouTube on the 50th anniversary of Earth Day. It asks hard questions about what it sees as the failure of well-meaning "green" efforts to halt climate change. Mr. Moore told Reuters that he once thought electric cars were a good idea, "but I didn’t really think about where is the electricity coming from? I assumed solar panels would last forever. I didn’t know what went into the making of them."

In the film, director Jeff Gibbs narrates: "What we have been calling green, renewable energy and industrial civilization are one and the same thing - desperate measures not to save the planet but to save our way of life." A better approach, Mr. Gibbs suggests, would be people having fewer children. “Infinite growth on a finite planet is suicide,” he says.

The film shows both abandoned industrial wind and solar farms and new ones being built -but after cutting down forests. “It suddenly dawned on me what we were looking at was a solar dead zone,” says Mr. Gibbs, staring at a former solar farm in California. “I learned that the solar panels don’t last.” 

 

Carbon Credit Scam: Carbon Markets Flop as CO2 Declines

The stated purpose of issuing and trading carbon credits was to reduce CO2 emissions. Now that, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, emissions have plunged, so have the carbon credit markets. According to Bloomberg, the price on the EU's  market has plunged 40% so far this year, erasing two years of gains in a market that was worth more the €200 billion. The EU's market stability reserve could bring the market back in balance in 2021 by removing excess credits from the market. As this CFACT article points out, the real purpose of "carbon markets" isn't to reduce CO2 emissions at all, but to make money.

 

Architect of UN's Paris Climate Agreement Dismisses Coronavirus Deaths and Misery

Christiana Figueres was the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, and thus the top UN climate official overseeing the drafting of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In an April 1 article for the New Scientist, Ms. Figueres continues to advocate for permanent restrictions on human behavior and economic activity, similar to what governments have imposed in response to Covid-19. In her article she failed to mention any of the tens of thousands of people who have died from the epidemic, writing: "The coronavirus pandemic is a tragedy and its consequences will be felt for a long time. Yet though global health conditions will eventually return to a form of normal, our environment will never do so," and "Moments of crisis are always moments of opportunity."

 

UN Climate Fund Calls Coronavirus "Opportunity" to Re-shape the World

The financial arm of the Paris Agreement –  the Green Climate Fund – has labelled the Covid-19 as an “opportunity” to raise funds for climate change action and “relaunch economies on low-emission, climate-resilient trajectories”. “While Covid-19 is causing untold suffering, the international response to this unprecedented health crisis in modern times offers an opportunity to direct finances towards bolstering climate action. GCF will continue to make critical investments in climate-resilient water resource management, health care facilities, agriculture and livelihoods – all of which are essential to subduing and overcoming the pandemic,” the organization wrote in press release: "The Green Climate Fund is confident that only a united approach – bringing together determined efforts and innovation – will provide lasting solutions to both the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change."

 

WHO Official Peddles False Pandemic Link To Climate Change

World Health Organization researcher Arthur Wyns authored an article in Scientific American claiming that climate change may "make the effects of a current or future pandemic worse." The article, Climate Change and Infectious Diseases, begins by acknowledging there is no evidence that weather and climate have had any effect on the emergence or transmission of the Covid-19 disease. He then goes on to claim that climate change could indirectly make the effects of a future pandemic worse by undermining environmental conditions needed for good health, including health systems.

As a Climate Change Dispatch article states, a warmer climate reduces that likelihood and severity of epidemics and pandemics. In fact, cold temperatures kill more people globally than warm or hot temperatures. While Mr. Wyn's article says: "climate change is causing widespread drought and desertification in much of the world, threatening the availability of water for consumption, food production, personal hygiene, and medical care, including for infectious disease.” However, the IPCC finds no such link.

 

Macron’s Climate Panel Wants To Ban Cars, 5G, Big Box Stores, More

The gilets jaunes protests of 2018 over fuel prices prompted French President Emmanuel Macron to delegate the fight against climate change to  a convention composed of 150 members of the public chosen at random. More than 250,000 people were contacted using a random telephone number search and asked if they wanted to join the convention. Most refused, but 150 agreed after being told that they would be paid  €86.24 a day plus expenses. The convention (Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat) first met last October where Mr. Macron asked its members to put forward proposals enabling France to cut its emissions by 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. He promised that their proposals would be implemented immediately, put before parliament for legislation, or submitted to the people in a referendum.

The convention has now come up with a plan modify the way the French shop, travel and produce food. Among its proposals:

  • Closure of out-of-town hypermarkets to encourage shopping locally,
  • Abandoning the 5G mobile network because it uses 30% more electricity than previous generations.
  • Prohibiting the sale of cars emitting more than 110 g of CO2 per km by 2025, in effect outlawing existing vehicles.
  • Banning television, radio, internet and press advertisements for products generating high levels of CO2.

Now with the French economy forecast to shrink by at least 6% due to the coronavirus lockdown, Mr. Macron will be under pressure to renege on his promise to the convention. If he implements them, he will be criticized by business leaders for adding to their burdens at the worst possible time.

The UK adopted the French model with its own citizens' assembly, called Climate Assembly UK, which is committed to determining how to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This assembly met for the first time last January.

 

Belgian Region to Block EU Climate Law

Flanders’ Environment Minister scolded the EU over its recently unveiled Climate Law, claiming it “unilaterally” revised the Dutch-speaking region’s climate objectives upwards. Flanders’ Environment Minister scolded the EU over its recently unveiled Climate Law, claiming it “unilaterally” revised the Dutch-speaking region’s climate objectives upwards, saying: "If Frans Timmermans [EU climate commissioner] wants to change the Flemish climate objectives for 2030, he should stand for election in Flanders." In a climate plan submitted to the EU last year, Flanders said it would aim for a “realistic” 32.6% cut in carbon emissions, below Brussels’ and Wallonia’s reduction goal of 40% and 55%, respectively.

 

Greenpeace Takes Arctic Oil Lawsuit to Norway's Supreme Court

After losing at the district court and appeals court stages, Greenpeace, together with Nature & Youth and the Norwegian branch of Friend of the Earth are taking their fight against Arctic oil drilling to Norway's Supreme Court. All 19 justices at the court will hear the case. The campaigners argue there is no room for any expansion of the oil industry under the global warming limits set by the Paris Agreement. Greenpeace and Nature & Youth have raised money for the legal battle through crowdfunding and received a 250,000 kroner ($23,000) donation from the Greta Thunberg Foundation.

 

Mercedes-Benz Ends Hydrogen Car Development Because It’s Too Costly

After working on fuel-cell vehicles for more than 30 years, Daimler’s Mercedes-Benz has concluded that the dream of a car with a long driving range, three-minute fill-ups and emitting only water vapor was uneconomic. The company built only a few hundred of the GLC F-Cell cars, which proved to be at least twice as costly to manufacture as equivalent battery-powered cars.

 

2020-04-03

 

COP26 Postponed

On April 1 the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change announced that, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the COP26 conference, originally scheduled to start next November 9 in Glasgow, will be rescheduled to some time in 2021. According to Climate Change Dispatch, the conference is now expected to take place in the middle of next year. The site designated for the conference, Glasgow's Scottish Events Campus, is being converted into a temporary hospital because of Covid-19.

Despite the postponement of COP26 governments are still supposed to submit tougher climate plans and ramp up ambition before the end of this year. So far, only four countries – the Marshall Islands, Suriname, Norway and Moldova – have done submitted stronger plans, called Nationally Determined Contributions. According to Bloomberg Green the pressure for tighter climate goals evaporated with the COP26 delay. The EU, which was previously considering its ambitious Green Deal strategy, now may lower its 2030 hope of lowering emissions by 50-55% below 1990 levels.

 

Covid-19 Effect - Moving Activism Online

Extinction Rebellion's basic strategy has been to create public spectacles, but that's no longer tenable as Covid-19 is keeping everyone home. So XR and fellow groups are abandoning public demonstrations and moving their activism online. A statement from the US Youth Climate Strike Coalition asks organizers to no longer physically mass mobilize for Earth Day in April "… and instead think critically and creatively about how to engage their communities in disrupting business as usual …" Greta Thunberg is moving her School Strike for Climate online as well, writing: "We listen to the science, and now the science says that mass gatherings will cause harm. But that won't stop us striking."

To keep its supporters optimistic about online activism, Extinction Rebellion has published a guidance for supporters that offers Plans A to C for activities depending on the level of public health concern, from concern has passed to no public gatherings.

 

Dutch Government: COVID-19 More Important than Climate Plans

Last December the Dutch Supreme Court ruled, in the Urgenda case, that the Netherlands government had to present plans by April 1 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% below 1990 levels for this year. However, after a cabinet meeting the economic affairs and climate policy minister said: "A lot of people, we included, have other things to do at the moment. The Urgenda court ruling still stands, but there are other priorities."

The decision of the Dutch government to postpone new climate measures signals a fundamental change in priorities by a country that has been one of the most committed to achieving climate goals.

 

Climate Alarmists Never Miss an Emergency

In the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic climate alarmists are quick to see a sliver lining. A MacLean's story laments the fact that governments are devoting more attention to the pandemic than to climate change, claiming that air pollutants are killing 570,000 children per year with rising temperatures leading to another 250,000 annual deaths. The MacLean's writer attributes this to politicians' tendency to make concrete plans to address short-term concerns, but only abstract plans for long-term ones. The International Energy Agency believes that political and financial leaders have "a historic opportunity" to usher in a new era for global climate action with the economic stimulus packages being rolled out to confront the impacts of the coronavirus. The head of the IEA said: “This is a historic opportunity for the world to, on one hand, create packages to recover the economy, but on the other hand, to reduce dirty investments and accelerate the energy transition.” A CNN story from Hong Kong considers the planet an unlikely beneficiary of reduced NO2 and CO2 emissions from factories and power plants in China, but frets the there will be "reverse pollution" as China restarts its economy.

A Climate Change Dispatch article describes how activists Christiana Figueres (former head of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change), veteran green fear-monger Thomas Homer-Dixon and Bill McKibben have decided to capitalize on the emerging pandemic. However, Times reporter Ed Conway outdoes them all with a piece that begins: "Don’t take this the wrong way but if you were a young, hardline environmentalist looking for the ultimate weapon against climate change, you could hardly design anything better than coronavirus. Unlike most other such diseases, it kills mostly the old who, let's face it, are more likely to be climate skeptics."

 

Green Fuel Plants Are Shutting Down and Some May Never Come Back

Bloomberg Green reports that coronavirus and cheap oil are hitting the fuel business so hard that ethanol plants are shutting down, and some may never come back. Even before the pandemic and the Russia-Saudi oil price war, producers were battling chronic oversupply. “When we come out of these two Black Swan events -- the price war in oil and now the coronavirus -- we will probably look differently as an industry,” said Todd Becker, chief executive officer of US ethanol producer Green Plains Inc. “There are definitely plants out there that are going to run out of capital.”

 

Rhode Island: Climate Lawsuit Will Create "Sustainable Funding Stream"

An amicus curiae filing in Rhode Island’s ongoing public nuisance climate change lawsuit against energy producers reveals that a senior RI official revealed the state's motivation for the suit: to secure a “sustainable funding stream.” The official, Director of the Department of Environmental Management, Janet Coit, attended a two-day event (Accelerating State Action on Climate Change) in July 2019 hosted by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Ms. Coit's remarks were transcribed by two other participants at the event.

 

BBC: Renewable Energy Plants Threaten Wilderness Areas

The BBC cites research published in the journal Global Change Biology that found that wind, solar and hydropower poses a growing threat to key conservation areas. The research team mapped the locations of around 12,500 of these installations, finding that more than 2,200 were built in wilderness, protected regions and key biodiversity areas. Of these, 169 were in strictly managed protected areas, where no development should occur.

"Green" energy facilities are often much larger than fossil fuel power plants, with wind and solar needing up to ten times the land area as coal or gas plants to produce the same amount of energy. While the authors of the report acknowledge that their work "will arm some skeptics," they are not saying that renewables are bad, they just need to be put in the right places.

 

How Exactly Do They Plan to Replace Fossil Fuels?

An essay by Paul Driessen, senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, examines the effects of zero-carbon plans as proposed by a number of US cities and states, as well as EU countries. In particular he questions how these jurisdictions plan to get the panels, turbines and batteries, including the raw materials to manufacture them, and then function as modern societies with pricey erratic energy and frequent power disruptions. It involves not just replacing the power output of today's coal and gas-fired power plants but tripling it. The Green New Dealers want to replace use of fossil fuels for surface transportation, as well as nuclear and hydro generation.

While admitting that the transition will eliminate a lot of fossil-fuel related jobs, GND politicians claim renewables will create millions of new ones. However, coal and gas-fired power plants generate more energy per worker (7,745 and 3,812 MWh) than wind (836 MWh) and solar (98 MWh), one of the reasons why renewable electricity costs more. The GND politicians and their media allies dodge the most glaring reality of them all: only a totalitarian government at local, state and national level could bring about the energy and economic transformation.

 

2020-02-21

 

Friends of Science 17th Annual Event

Another reminder of the Friends of Science event on April 6 in Calgary at the Red and White Club, 1833 Crowchild Trail NW. The title of the event is Freedom of Speech!.NO Climate Emergency, featuring investigative journalist Donna Laframboise and research scientist Roy Spencer. Doors open at 5:45 pm. The event opens with a buffet dinner (included) during the mix 'n mingle from 6:00-7:00 pm.

Tickets can be ordered here by March 27, 2020. Early bird tickets are on sale until February 29.

 

Patrick Moore: Why I Was Banned from Speaking in Regina

On February 7 past president of Greenpeace Canada, Patrick Moore, was deplatformed for the first time in 45 years of giving keynote speeches at conferences around the world. The City of Regina had signed a contract with him to kick off their Reimagine Regina Conference next May but caved to local activists and told Mr. Moore to stay away. In its announcement of the banning, the city said it did not want “to spark a debate on climate change.” It said the stated goal of the conference is “to make the city’s facilities and operations 100 per cent renewable by 2050.” Regina is one of at least 54 cities and towns in Canada that are virtue signaling by declaring a state of “climate emergency.” 

After the cancellation, Mr. Moore found a new platform to speak in Regina on May 19, the night before the conference begins. The new venue was booked for him by Rebel Media founder Ezra Levant, who emailed: "Media bullies, environmental extremists and political scolds thought they could deplatform Dr. Moore. We’re re-platforming him — and it looks like he’ll have a far larger audience than before."

 

Imagine a World Without Oil

Larry Bell, an endowed professor of space architecture at the University of Houston, imagines that all of the current hydrocarbon energy were replaced by wind, water and sunlight. As proposed by the Green New Dealers, 80-85% of the existing energy sectors would be electrified by 2030 and 100% by 2050. This includes all demands for transportation, heating/cooling, industrial, and agriculture/forestry/fishing. Referring to data compiled for Friends of Science by electrical engineering professor Michael Kelly and energy economist Robert Lyman, Prof. Bell lists some sobering examples:

  • Accommodating the 46,480 solar photovoltaic (PV) plants envisioned in wind, water and sunlight (WWS) plan for just the US would take up 650,720 square miles, almost 20% of the lower 48 states.
  • In Western Europe at the end of 2014 renewable generation capacity amounted to 22%, but the actual output was only 3%.
  • To replace the 440 MW of US generation expected to be retired over the next 25 years would take 29.3 billion solar PV panels and 4.4 million battery modules, covering an area equal to that of New Jersey It would require 929 years to build this many panels at the rate of one per second.
  • A central component of WWS calls for the electrification of all transportation uses, which is now technologically impossible as no battery storage exists for heavy-duty trucks, marine vehicles and aircraft.
  • The costs of electrifying passenger rail systems are so high that no private railway would ever take them on.
  • In rough terms, it requires the energy equivalent of about 100 barrels of oil to fabricate a quantity of batteries that can store a single barrel of oil-equivalent energy.

Nevertheless, the WWS plan includes a call to shut down all coal, oil and natural gas production

 

Americans Reluctant to Join the EV Train

Even though the number of battery-electric car models doubled from 2018 to 2019, Americans are showing their lack of enthusiasm by avoiding the dealerships. Only 325,000 electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles were sold in the U.S. in 2019, down from 349,000 in 2018. Those dismal numbers represent an embarrassing 2% of the 17 million vehicles of all types sold in the United States in 2019. California remains the primary buyer of EVs while the rest of America has shown little interest in the incentives and the increasing choices of models.

Several factors may be contributing to this lack of enthusiasm:

  • While there are no or low fuel costs and no fuel tax for EVs, once they predominate EV owners are going to be picking up the costs for highway infrastructure through some form of vehicle mileage tax.
  • EVs have no tailpipes themselves, but the power plants supplying the electricity to charge and car batteries and the refineries producing all the petroleum-derived parts for the EVs do.
  • Range and charging anxieties remain constant in EV drivers' minds. To fully charge an EV, even at fast-charging stations, it takes anywhere from 30 minutes to 8 hours.
  • Extracting the exotic metals used in EV batteries exposes local ecosystems to destruction when the wastewater and other unusable ores are let loose onto the environments. The workers have no choice but to live in horrific conditions because their wages are so infinitesimally small,
  • Replacing an electric vehicle’s battery will be an expensive proposition along with the environmental challenges to dispose of them safely.

 

Why The Green New Deal Would Destroy The Environment

Writing in The Federalist, Paul Diessen argues that environmentalists have paid too little attention to the serious harm Green New Deal policies would inflict on the environment — including scenic lands, wildlife habitats, and threatened and endangered species. Solar farms generate only 1.5% of US electricity. To replace the 8 billion kWh now generated by fossil fuels and nuclear, would require blanketing 57,000 square miles of land (equivalent to the land area of New York and Vermont) with 19 billion photovoltaic solar panels — assuming that they all were installed in sunny Nevada.

Onshore wind turbines are no better. Replacing all the nation's fossil fuels and nuclear would require more than 500,000 square miles of farm, wildlife habitat, and scenic lands. That’s equivalent to the combined acreage of Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, and one-quarter of Washington state. The 56,000 wind turbines already installed slaughter millions of bats and birds every year. The millions of turbines required by the Green New Deal could even threaten the existence of some species. Renewable energy proponents tout offshore wind turbines as superior to those on land because ocean winds blow more steadily. Yet because of opposition from environmental groups, only one relatively small offshore facility is operating today off Rhode Island’s coastline.

Solar panels require many toxic materials, and wind turbines require enormous amounts of steel, concrete, copper, and rare earth elements. Storing a week’s worth of power for periods when the sun is not shining or the wind isn’t blowing would require about 2 billion half-ton Tesla car battery packs. Meeting these needs would require a massive expansion of mining for lithium, cobalt, and other substances in the US or in Asia, Africa, and South America. Moreover, operations in the latter parts of the world involve extensive child labor and create environmental disasters.

Disposing of obsolescent solar panels, wind turbines and batteries is already causing problems in the US and countries like Germany. Thus, the Green New Deal is anything but "clean" or "green."

  

EU Threatens UK with Carbon Tariffs

Brussels negotiators are seeking to lock the UK into EU rules on climate change as tensions rise over a future trade deal. The bloc wants Britain to sets up an independent watchdog to ensure it sticks to green commitments and it called on the UK to remain as part of its carbon trading market. Specifically, the EU wants Britain to consider becoming an associate member of its Emissions Trading System. The ETS, the world’s largest carbon market, works by setting a cap on emissions and requiring industry to hold a permit for each tonne of CO2 emitted. However, PM Boris Johnson insists that Britain will not accept EU rules as the price of a trade deal.

Sources in Brussels are drafting plans to give the European Commission power to levy a tax on imports of goods with a heavy CO2 footprint. It is aimed primarily at non-EU countries such as the US, China and Russia, but could be imposed on the UK if it diverges too far from the EU's green policies.

 

Germany's Wind Giants Now Want Taxpayer Subsidies

During the first round of auctions for offshore wind power in 2017 developers were happy to forgo any subsidies, confident that the technology was robust enough to turn a profit unaided. Now potential bidders for the next round of auctions for 2022 are concerned that the German government's muddled climate policy will make investments in the technology riskier. As a result investors are seeking UK-style contracts-for-difference to ensure that they get paid enough for their power, no matter what wholesale prices are doing.

 

Offshore Wind Deployment "Too Slow" to Meet EU Climate Target

A record 3.6 GW of new offshore wind capacity was added across Europe in 2019, bringing the total installed capacity to 22 GW, according to the industry's trade association WindEurope. (Nearly half that added capacity, 1.7 GW, came from the UK, which is no longer a member of the EU.) However, the association claims 3.6 GW is not enough to reach the EU's ambitious target of 230-450 GW of installed offshore wind power by 2050. This would require adding 7 GW/year to 2030 and ramping up to 18 GW/year by 2050. 

Deployment of wind energy in Europe faces obstacles, mainly related to slow permitting procedures, installing grids and resistance from local populations. The European Commission said it will address them in a new “offshore wind strategy” due to be presented before the end of the year.

 

Best Response Ever to a Fossil-Fuel Divestment Demand

Two students at Oxford University's St. John's College wanted the college to immediately sell more than $10 million of its endowment invested in Shell and BP. The college's bursar, Andrew Parker made them a counteroffer: "I am not able to arrange any divestment at short notice. But I can arrange for the gas central heating in college to be switched off with immediate effect. Please let me know if you support this proposal." Apparently, this idea did not go over well. 

 

Beware the Eco-Stalinist Witch Hunters

A climate advocacy group called Skeptical Science hosts a list of academics and others whom it labels "climate misinformers." One of the 17 academics on the list is Judith Curry, formerly the chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech,. One of the principals of Skeptical Science, Dana Nuccitelli wrote of her: "if you look at the statements we cataloged and debunked on her page, it should make her unhirable in academia."

Roger Pielke Jr. spoke to Prof. Curry about the Skeptical Science list and was told that in 2012 she was informed by the Dean at Georgia Tech that she had to step down because of "extreme displeasure by several activist climate scientists who had a very direct pipeline to the Dean." Prof. Curry's subsequent attempts to secure another academic position failed because "I was an outstanding candidate, looked excellent on paper, articulated a strong vision, and interviewed very well in person. The showstopper was my public profile in the climate debate, as evidenced by a simple Google search."

As Dr. Pielke puts it, "what has happened to Curry is just the tip of the iceberg."

 

2020-01-30

 

Friends of Science 17th Annual Event

"Freedom of Speech! NO Climate Emergency!"

We are pleased to announce an enlightening climate policy and science evening featuring two excellent speakers.

Donna Laframboise - Investigative Journalist:

"Climate Activists Want Your Freedom"

In the name of saving the planet, activists are shutting down free speech. They're getting people fired. They're poking their nose into every corner of your life. Freedom is going extinct, one climate measure at a time.

Dr. Roy W. Spencer - Principal Research Scientist:

"10 Reasons Why there is No Climate Emergency"

The current claims of a "climate emergency" are shown to be gross exaggerations. Recent warming of the climate system has been modest and benign, and at the low end of the warming predicted by the computerized climate model projections used to guide changes in national energy policy. Climate model projections of human-caused climate change are based upon the assumption that climate does not change naturally, and so represent an example of circular reasoning. From sea level rise to wildfires to severe weather, there has been little to no change observed which is outside the realm of natural variation. Thus, the "climate emergency" claims are not based upon science.

These presentations are designed for the general public. No special climate policy or science knowledge required.

Doors open at 5:45 pm. The event opens with a buffet dinner (included) during the mix 'n mingle from 6:00-7:00 pm followed by opening messages and our speakers.

Deadline to order tickets here is March 27, 2020. Early bird tickets are on sale until February 29, 2020. As climate dogma increases, your freedoms are lost, your kids are scared. Debunk it! Join us April 6th.

 

Canadian Institute for Climate Choices

January 21 saw the launch of the Canadian Institute for Climate Choices with the help of $20 million over five years from the federal government. The institute, which will maintain independent control over its own research and reporting, is the result of a partnership between 15 climate-focused organizations that answered a federal call for proposals in 2018. Three expert panels — focused on adaptation, mitigation and clean growth — will inform the institute's work. Also on January 21 the institute issued its first report, Charting Our Course - Bringing clarity to Canada's climate policy choices on the journey to 2050. Using an analogy of Canada as a ship facing a climate change storm heading towards it (threatening floods, heatwaves, wildfires, and sea-level rise), the document sets out key aspirations:

  • Carbon neutrality by 2050;
  • Making communities and infrastructure more resilient to the inevitable impacts of a changing climate;
  • Growing the prosperity of Canadians across all regions, all communities, and all socio-economic circumstances.

While the aspirations are clear, how to achieve them is not, because "for many Canadians, climate change remains complex, confusing, and potentially paralyzing." So, the report "is a starting point for a deeper, broader, and more constructive conversation about how we can chart a course as a country—through the profound changes ahead—to a resilient and prosperous future with cleaner and more inclusive growth." The report concludes with four recommendations:

  • Canadian governments should broaden objectives for climate policy (e.g., going beyond achieving emission-reduction targets);
  • Canadian governments should embrace Canada’s role in global outcomes (i.e., influence global change rather than reacting to it);
  • Canadian governments should expand the scope, scale, and pace of climate policies (i.e., increasing "ambition");
  • Those analyzing and developing policy options should seek out integrated solutions that drive multiple benefits (i.e., break down traditional policy silos and get "all hands on deck" for the hard work required.)

 

CLINTEL Manifesto Blasts Climate Scaremongering

CLINTEL ("climate intelligence") is a rapidly growing international group, led by prominent scientists, who oppose the ill-founded attempts to scare people into hasty climate policy actions. It recently issued a World Climate Declaration denouncing scaremongering, and this new manifesto provides detailed scientific backup for the WCD for a wide public. The manifesto was authored by Professor Guus Berkhout, President of CLINTEL, who explains it in an 11-minute video. The focus of the manifesto is on climate-related modeling, which it says is “unfit for purpose.” The purpose in this case is predicting future climate change. Modeling dominates climate science. It also provides the scary scenarios that drive hugely expensive and disruptive climate emergency action policies.

The manifesto lists four reasons why today's models are no good:

  • They exclude many natural factors and assume that all climate change is due to human influence;
  • The models run too "hot";
  • They lack consideration of historical data regarding climate sensitivity to CO2;
  • The models cannot explain past warming and cooling.

 

Who Checks the Fact Checkers?

Paul Homewood, who runs the blog Not a Lot of People Know That, posted an article titled Green ideology, not climate change makes wildfires worse that was sourced from an commentary of last March by the Volunteer Firefighters Association of New South Wales. Mr. Homewood's post was shared on Facebook by Friends of Science. However, Facebook decided to flag the FoS post as "Misleading" based on a report by the self-proclaimed fact-checking site Climate Feedback. Following the Misleading stamp Climate Feedback provided several paragraphs of text supporting the orthodox view on climate change being behind the severity of the Aussie bushfires.

Mr. Homewood finds the decision by Facebook to flag the post extremely troubling in a number of ways:

  • Who decides who should be the arbiter of facts, and how is this decision made?
  • The claim that Climate Feedback says is misleading was never made in Mr. Homewood's piece, but was taken from a Breitbart article;
  • Climate Feedback failed to find anything incorrect in the FoS post. Mr. Homewood then examines some highly questionable statements in the Factcheck post.

 

YouTube Accused of Monetizing and Promoting Climate Science Denial

Mr. Homewood isn't the only one concerned about censoring of climate-related posts on social media, but in this case it's about not enough censorship. Here, DeSmog accuses Google's affiliate YouTube of "promoting climate science denial" while earning ad money by doing so. Since February 2019 DeSmog has been aware that YouTube's search algorithm was leading unsuspecting viewers "into an alternate universe where facts, physics, and real-world experiences are replaced by conspiracies, cherry-picking, and fossil fuel–backed propaganda." Back then DeSmog took comfort in a Google white paper wherein it detailed its work "to tackle the intentional spread of misinformation—across Google Search, Google News, YouTube and our advertising systems."

Alas, the promise of Google's white paper counted for little when DeSmog became aware of a report of January 15 by Avaaz titled Why is YouTube Broadcasting Climate Misinformation to Millions? In this document Avaaz describes how it "set out to analyze how effectively YouTube is protecting its users from climate misinformation," relating in detail the role of the algorithm, examples of "climate misinformation" videos, brands advertised, and then listing recommendations. Avaaz' key findings:

  • For the search termglobal warming,” 16% of the top 100 related videos included under the up-next feature and suggestions bar had misinformation about climate change;
  • The climate misinformation videos that Avaaz reviewed had 21.1 million views collectively;
  • Avaaz was able to identify 108 brands running ads on these climate misinformation videos;
  • Even worse, one in five of these ads found were from green or ethical brands including Greenpeace, WWF and Save the Children.

Avaaz recommends that YouTube: detox its algorithm; demonetize disinformation and correct the record.

 

US House Democrats Want Google to Censor ALL Climate Dissent

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL), chair of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, has written a letter to Google and Alphabet Inc. CEO Sundar Pichai urging him to suppress “dangerous climate misinformation on YouTube.” The letter makes a number of demands for censorship from YouTube, calling on the video-sharing platform to:

  • Stop promoting climate denial and climate disinformation videos by removing them immediately from the platform’s recommendation algorithm;
  • Add “climate misinformation” to the platform’s list of borderline content;
  • Stop monetizing videos that promote harmful misinformation and falsehoods and about the causes and effects of the climate crisis;
  • Take steps to correct the record for millions of users who have been exposed to climate misinformation on YouTube.

Unlike European countries, progressives in the US are theoretically prevented by the First Amendment from passing laws against lawful content on tech platforms. However, this does not stop politicians like Rep. Castor from making censorship demands of tech companies. Two days after her letter Rep. Castor was accused of censorship by climate skeptics.

 

Greta vs. Donald at Davos

This year the speakers at the World Economic Forum in Davos included Swedish climate worrier Greta Thunberg and US President Donald Trump. First up on January 21 was Ms. Thunberg, who expressed disappointment that the world is neither listening nor reacting to her repeated warnings of impending climate catastrophe, saying “basically nothing” has changed since she dropped out of school and began full-time climate protesting. In an interview she asserted that there are less than eight years to prevent a global temperature rise of 1.5°C.

Mr. Trump wasn't having any apocalyptic nonsense, stating "this is not a time for pessimists. It is a time for optimism." He then listed some of the doomsday predictions which failed to come true: (1) “They predicted an overpopulation crisis in the 1960s, mass starvation in the 70s, the end of oil in the 1990s.” (2) “These alarmists always demand the same thing: absolute power to dominate, transform and control every aspect of our lives. We will never let radical socialists destroy our economy, wreck our country, eradicate our liberty.” His speech noted that, while many European countries struggle with crippling energy costs, the American energy revolution is saving American families $2,500 every year by lowering electric bills.

 

EU Reveals Climate Fund Details

On January 14 the EU Commission revealed its long-awaited Just Transition Mechanism as a "pledge of solidarity and fairness" to make sure that no one is left behind in the bloc's Green Deal ambition to become carbon neutral by 2050. Under the new proposal carbon-intensive regions and industries will be able to apply for money from a Just Transition Fund (JTF), opening the door for producers of steel and plastics, and not just coal miners, peat farmers and oil-shale workers. The aim for the JTF is to mobilize capital worth €100 billion through grants, private investment and support from the European Investment Bank. The EU itself will contribute just €7.5 billion.

However, the fund’s promised €7.5 billion figure has already been criticized for being too low to match the size of the challenge ahead. One German member of the European Parliament likened the overall €100 billion figure to a “slight of hand” and compared the Commission to “street magicians”, while Friends of the Earth Europe said it “is too little to match the scale of transformation needed to confront the planetary emergency." The trade union group ETUC Confederal said in a statement “the funding proposed for 10 years is what would be needed every year to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 in a fair way."

EU climate chief Frans Timmermans acknowledged that the €100 billion is “just a start” but insisted that the fairness of the proposal will inspire the rest of the Green Deal.

 

UN: World Needs to Prepare for Millions of Climate Refugees

On January 20 the UN Human Rights Committee made a landmark ruling in relation to a man from the Pacific nation of Kiribati who brought a case against New Zealand after authorities there denied his claim of asylum because of climate change. The Committee determined that countries cannot deport people who have sought asylum due to climate-related threats. The next day in Davos the UN's high commissioner for refugees referred to that ruling and said that the world needs to prepare for millions of people being driven from their homes by the impact of climate change. We must be prepared for a large surge of people moving against their will," he said. "I wouldn't venture to talk about specific numbers, it's too speculative, but certainly we're talking about millions here."

 

2020-01-19

 

US Appeals Court Dismisses Youth Activists' Climate Suit

Five years ago 21 young people, represented by Our Children's Trust sued the US government alleging that it was violating their constitutional rights by contributing to climate change despite knowing its dangerous consequences. Both the Obama and the Trump administrations tried multiple times to get the case, known as Juliana v. United States, thrown out. However, an Oregon district court judge ruled that the case had legal standing.

In a 2-1 decision on January 17 the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals "… reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate." One of the two judges behind the decision wrote that "although the plaintiffs "made a compelling case that action is needed," it was beyond the court's power to "order, design, supervise, or implement the plaintiffs' requested remedial plan." The dissenting judge wrote that the youth plaintiffs have standing to challenge the government’s conduct, have articulated claims under the Constitution, and have presented sufficient evidence to press those claims at trial. Counsel for the youth plaintiffs vowed to ask the full Ninth Circuit to review the determination that federal courts can do nothing to address an admitted constitutional violation.

In Canada there is a similar youth lawsuit, La Rose et. al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, modelled on Juliana, that was filed last October and is still pending.

 

Time to Silence the Voices of Denial

This is the title of an editorial in the Winnipeg Free Press that bemoans the fact that, despite the "grim studies" and "pleas from scientists, who have reached a near-universal consensus on human-made climate change," climate skeptics do not take the issue seriously. In the opinion of the FP's editors "climate change deniers” have been controlling the conversation and should no longer be part of it. The editorial caught the attention of Donna Laframboise who noticed when one of the duplicate versions disappeared from the FP's website. In her view newspapers are supposed to promote debate about society's most pressing problems, not silence intellectual minorities such as climate skeptics.

Anti-energy researcher Naomi Oreskes calls for regulations on free speech. She accuses the fossil-fuel industry of exploiting the journalistic ideals of fairness, objectivity and balance by manipulating journalists into presenting propaganda for the other side. Since all previous electronic media – radio, telephone and television – have been regulated, so should its newest form. Also, Ms. Oreskes wants the US Congress to investigate the fossil fuel industry “and its allies,” as a precursor to possible criminal charges. 

In Germany climate activists are using local declarations of climate emergency to call for laws to punish those who trivialize the climate catastrophe and thereby sabotage the emergency measures to deal with it. The last time there were emergency laws in Germany was 80 years ago.

 

FT: Democracies Ill-Suited to Deal with Climate Change

According to the Financial Times, giving ordinary people a say over public policy impedes climate action, because we don’t care enough about other people’s problems. Edward Luce the US national editor of the FT writes that harrowing images of the Australian bushfires and the California wildfires should be blowing a hole in such complacency. Instead, they show how hard it is for democracies to mobilize public action.

One obstacle is that it's difficult for governments, because of the electoral cycle, to take unpopular actions to reduce CO2 emissions. A second is the uncertainty of establishing that any single disaster is entirely man-made (i.e., due to human CO2 emissions.) The third is human nature: people don't like to be lectured on climate change by 17-year old girls.

 

The Aussie Bushfires

The bushfires blazing throughout Australia have gotten a lot of press. Predictably, mainstream papers like the NY Times blamed Australia for committing climate suicide, calling the country "ground zero for the climate catastrophe." Prime Minister Scott Morrison's attempt to play both sides of the climate game spectacularly backfired. There are direct human causes for the fires than climate change however – bad forestry practices and arson. Thirty years of misguided green ideology, vested interests, political failure and forestry mismanagement have created a massive bushfire threat. Police across Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania have arrested 183 people for lighting bushfires. Patrick Michaels and Myron Ebel compare the similarities between Californian and Australian practices in politics, forest management practices and responses to the inevitable fires that ensue.

Others have been looking at the historical and scientific context for the fires. Considering the past 119 years of Australian rainfall, while the most recent two years have been dry, over the last half century the country has been a lot wetter than the previous half century. Jennifer Marohasy points out that it has been hotter and fires have burned larger areas. In particular there was one fire catastrophe in 1939 that burned 2 million ha.

 

Ontario Government Cancels Approval for Nearly Completed Wind Farm to Save Endangered Bat Species

Shortly after taking office in 2018 the new Ontario government cancelled 758 wind projects for economic reasons. In December 2019 the government pulled the plug on the almost complete Nations Rise project near Ottawa. The project had been granted approval for up 33 turbines (later scaled back to 29) at a cost of $200 million. It was intended to generate up to 100 megawatts of electricity under a 20-year, $400-million contract awarded by the province's Independent Electric System Operator.The reason for the cancellation was to prevent the inevitable annihilation of Hoary, Big and Little Brown bats; the Little Brown bat is identified as one of Ontario’s "Species at Risk." 

The wind farm had caused deep divisions in the community as the township had twice voted against being a “willing host” for the project. While some 70 property owners were happy about leasing land to the project's owner EDP Renewables, many others were concerned about noise, the visual disruption and the possible impacts on health and the water table in the area. EDP is now assessing "possible legal actions."

 

Energy Paradox Puts Europe in a Precarious Position

Despite its cool Green parties and ambitious wind and solar agendas, Europe remains by far the world's largest importer of oil and natural gas. As oil output from the North Sea and the coast of Norway declines, the European Union is quietly looking for fossil fuel energy anywhere it can find it. Despite Europe's having more reserves of shale gas than the US, most European countries shun horizontal drilling and fracking, leaving the continent dependent on Russia, the Middle East and Africa for its energy. What ensures that Europeans have enough daily gasoline and home heating fuel are not batteries, wind farms and solar panels – much less loud green proselytizing. They count instead on a mercurial Russia, an array of unstable Middle Eastern governments and an underappreciated US military. 

It is hard to be both the world largest importer of gas and oil and the loudest critic of fossil fuels, but Europe has managed to do it.

 

Germany Rejects EU Call for More Money to Fight Climate Change

The German government is resisting a plea by Brussels to provide more funding to get the EU's flagship climate change policy off the ground – in a blow the continent's decarbonisation hopes. Promoted by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the bloc's ambitious €1 trillion Green Deal includes a new "Just Transition Mechanism" to compensate and regenerate areas that currently depend on carbon-intensive industries like coal mining. But Germany’s finance ministry has already started the year by rejecting calls for more funding, stating that the current EU budget is sufficient to meet the continent's climate goal of going carbon neutral by 2050. The ministry also dismissed the idea of increasing the capital limit on the European Investment Bank, which Ms. von der Leyen had suggested could also help close the funding gap.

 

Greta To Lecture World Leaders at Davos About Ending Fossil Fuels

Teen climate change activist Greta Thunberg plans to join other youth at the World Economic Forum on January 21 in Davos, Switzerland, where they will admonish world leaders for providing subsidies to the oil and gas industry, which is responsible, in part, for advancing civilization by providing abundant and affordable energy. Among the calls of the youth group: "We demand that at this year’s Forum, participants from all companies, banks, institutions and governments immediately halt all investments in fossil fuel exploration and extraction, immediately end all fossil fuel subsidies and immediately and completely divest from fossil fuels. We don’t want these things done by 2050, 2030 or even 2021, we want this done now – as in right now." 

According to the Science Daily website removing fossil-fuel subsidies will not reduce CO2 emissions and renewable energy use as much as hoped. The largest emissions savings would be in oil and gas exporting countries, where fewer poor people would be affected, and subsidy removal can be aided by currently low oil prices.

 

Mark Carney's Case Against Fossil Fuels

After finishing his term as governor of the Bank of England this year, Mark Carney will become the UN’s special envoy on climate action and finance. He is using his final days as governor to intimate institutional financial managers by suggesting that investments in conventional, fossil-fuel energy are high-risk ventures requiring special justification. When asked point-blank in a recent interview whether he supported “divestment” from fossil fuels he tactfully evaded the question but nevertheless asserted that coal, oil and gas were insecure assets. John Constable, energy editor of the Global Warming Policy Forum, cites data from the International Energy Agency showing that nearly all the growth in global energy consumption since 1990 has been accounted for by fossil fuels. 

Terence Corcoran of the Financial Post notes that Mr. Carney is just part of an international movement to turn the world’s energy investors into pawns of state climate activists and agitators for market-distorting policies. The movement wants a new model of financial markets, one that is “sustainable” and “green” and “social” and “environmental” and “equitable." Mr. Corcoran argues that the real risks in energy markets is not the likelihood of stranded coal and oil reserves, but renewables which have failed to make advances despite three decades of incentives, mandates, subsidies and other unsustainable policies, as shown by Germany's dismal experience.

 

Decades of Public Opinion: Climate Change Is Not on the Radar

Each month, Gallup polling asks 1,000 random members of the US public to identify “the most important problem facing this country today.” Donna Laframboise has analyzed Gallup's results for the past two decades, finding that two or three answers typically dominate (economy, government, domestic issues), followed by a long list of concerns mentioned by small numbers of people. However, over the past two decades climate change has never been part of the table of top four issues, meaning it's a less than marginal concern.

 

Another Expensive Solar Scheme Bites the Dust

The Crescent Dunes thermal solar plant in central Nevada looks like something out of a sci-fi movie. Ten thousand mirrors form a spiral almost 2 miles wide that winds around a skyscraper rising above the desert between Las Vegas and Reno. The operation soaks up enough heat from the sun’s rays to spin steam turbines and store energy in the form of molten salt. This feature overcomes the greatest weakness in solar electricity: supplying power outside the hours of peak sunshine. In 2011 the $1 billion project was to be the biggest solar project of its kind, supported by $737 million in federal government loan guarantees.

The steam generators at Crescent Dunes require custom parts and a staff of dozens to keep things humming and to conduct regular maintenance. When the plant opened in 2015 the cost of solar PV electricity (which requires little ongoing maintenance) fell to less than the $135/MWh that Crescent Dunes was charging its customer NV Energy. Today PV-produced electricity costs less than $30/MWh. Last April Crescent Dunes shut down and the US Energy Department took control in August.

 

2020-01-07

 

ExxonMobil Prevails in New York Climate Lawsuit

On December 10 ExxonMobil emerged victorious in a securities fraud trial that examined its internal accounting for the financial risks of climate change, in a striking rejection of claims by the New York attorney general that the company misled investors for years. New York State Supreme Court Judge Barry Ostrage cleared ExxonMobil of fraud claims saying that New York’s attorney general failed to establish that the oil company had deceived investors about how it accounted for the cost of future climate change regulation. However, the judge did not let ExxonMobil entirely off the hook, saying: "Nothing in this opinion is intended to absolve ExxonMobil from responsibility for contributing to climate change through the emission of greenhouse gases in the production of its fossil fuel products." 

During the trial, the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James accused the company of using two different accounting methods — one public, and one internal — to project its business costs in countries that were expected to implement policies to combat climate change. 

The Rockefeller Family Fund's executive director, who was the instigator of the New York AG's investigation against ExxonMobil, seemed disappointed to learn the limits of his attempts to use public officials to prosecute his enemies. RealClear Energy published a legal analysis of this case and similar ones involving state attorneys general. The problem for the states is that they have no jurisdiction over climate change, which is why the New York AG charged ExxonMobil with securities fraud, which proved too much of a stretch to secure conviction. It was a case of misguided idealism that became impatient with the basic principle of the rule of law, thwarted by an "old fashioned" trial judge who looked at whether the evidence supported the charges filed.

  

Dutch Court Upholds Order to Cut Netherlands Emissions 25% by EOY 2020

A judgment in the Dutch Supreme Court has left the Netherlands government with a legal requirement to perform the politically suicidal task of cutting emissions 25% by the end of 2020, The case was brought six years ago by the Urgenda ("urgent agenda") environmental group in a bid to force ministers to go well beyond EU targets. However, the chances of reaching the 20% target look slim, as emissions in 2018 were down only 15% on 1990 levels. 

The court based its ruling on the UN climate convention and the state's legal obligation to protect the lives and well-being of Dutch citizens. “There is a great deal of consensus in the scientific and international community over the urgent need for a reduction in greenhouse gases by at least 25% by developed countries,” the court said. As an editorial by the Compeititive Enterprise Institute puts it: "This is judicial tyranny in overdrive."

  

Sales of Electric Vehicles Plummet in Ontario

After winning the June 2018 election the new government of Doug Ford cancelled the rebate of up to $14,000 for electric vehicles, saying that the money was going to people who could already afford expensive cars. In the first six months of 2019 sales in Ontario were down 59% compared to the same period in 2018 (2,933 vs 7,110). Rebates are key because the up-front cost of an electric vehicle can be anywhere from $10,000 to $30,000 more than a similar gas-powered car. Nationally, the federal government introduced a $5,000 rebate last spring, but EVs are still only a 3.5%, a far cry from the government's target of 10% by 2025. 

 

US Congress Turns Down Expanding EV Tax Credits

Prior to Congress taking its December recess automakers were hoping that it would extend the electric vehicle tax credits. The extension got through the House, but not the Senate, which wasn't interested. While the current $7,500 EV tax credit remains in place, Tesla and General Motors have both reached their 200,000-vehicle quota. They and other automakers lobbied for an expansion, one which would have seen a $7,000 credit kept in place until a manufacturer sold 600,000 electric automobiles.

  

The EU’s Green Deal

On December 11 the European Commission unveiled its European Green Deal with the objective of reaching net zero CO2 emissions by 2050, a goal which would be enshrined in a "Climate Law", to be presented in March 2020. The Commission expects to update the bloc's climate ambition by revising its 2030 objective of a 40% cut in emissions to 50-55%. Beside CO2 emission targets, the deal includes a "circular economy", building renovation, zero pollution, ecosystems and diversity, farm-to-fork strategy, transport and money (with a "leave no one behind" Just Transition Mechanism), R&D and innovation, and external relations (including a proposal for a carbon border tax.) 

The Green Deal failed its first test at the December 12 meeting of the European Council (made up of the heads of government), where Poland refused to give the required unanimous endorsement. According to the Council's official conclusions: "One Member State, at this stage, cannot commit to implement this objective as far as it is concerned, and the European Council will come back to this in June 2020 " A previous effort to get the EU to commit to net-zero emissions by the mid-century was blocked by Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in June 2019.

  

Biden Tells Crowd: Oil Execs Should Be Jailed

Former vice president and presidential candidate Joe Biden told a crowd in Peterborough, New Hampshire that if fossil fuel executives don’t take accountability for helping to doom the environment, we should throw them in jail. In order to curb the rate of pollution, Mr. Biden explained, we need to hold fossil fuel executives “liable for what they have done, particularly in those cases where there are underserved neighborhoods. When they don’t deliver, he said, “put them in jail.” 

 

Mark Carney to Head a UN Climate Action Project

Climate Activist and Bank of England Governor Mark Carney is taking on a new role as UN’s new Special Envoy for Climate Action. Describing the Canadian as “a remarkable pioneer in pushing the financial sector to act on climate”, the UN Secretary General said the new envoy would be focusing on ambitious implementation of action, especially shifting markets and mobilizing private finance, towards limiting global warming to the key 1.5°C mark. Mr. Carney replaces former New York mayor and billionaire philanthropist, Michael Bloomberg, who has embarked on a US presidential run.

 

Climate-alarmist Banks Go Carbon-colonialist

Africa has the world's lowest electrification rate-613 kWh/year per capita, compared to 6,500 kWh/year in Europe and 13,000 kWh/year in the US. Over 600 million people in sub-Saharan Africa have no electricity and 700 million rely on wood, grass and dung for cooking and heating. The African Development Bank (AfDB) launched a $12 billion New Deal for Energy in 2017, with the goal of 100% access to electricity in urban areas and 95% access in rural areas by 2025.

Tthen the AfDB caved to carbon-colonialist pressure, joining the World Bank, Goldman Sachs and other multi-lateral banks in caring more about climate alarmism and avoiding criticism than about safeguarding the lives, livelihoods, health and living standards of electricity-deprived Africans. The AfDB now says almost nothing about coal or even natural gas. Its new themes include responding to global concerns about climate change, gradually adopting a “low-carbon and sustainable growth path,” significantly reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and transitioning to “green growth” and “clean renewable energy."

 

"I don't want to die!"-Climate Exploitation of Children

Last October a group of seven and eight year olds gathered in their school library in Toronto to watch a video of Greta Thunberg's speech to the UN on September 23. During the presentation at least one child yelled "I don’t want to die!. A mother said the carbon clock displayed after the speech showing an eight-year count down had her daughter crying: "Mommy, they said that we’re going to die in eight years." 

This 7:49 video by Friends of Science describes how environmental charities like Ecojustice and foundations like "We Don't Have Time" are using children as pawns in a climate lawsuit against the Ontario government. Similar climate fear-mongers are behind the visits to schools like the one in Toronto.

 

Why “Green” Energy Is Such a Terrible Idea

Using wind power to replace the 3.9 billion MWh that Americans consumed in 2018, coal and gas-fired backup power plants, natural gas for home heating, coal and gas for factories, and gasoline for vehicles – while generating enough extra electricity every windy day to charge batteries for just seven straight windless days – would require some 14 million 1.8-MW wind turbines. These turbines, sprawling across ¾ of the lower 48 states, would require 15 billion tons of steel, concrete and other materials and would wipe out eagles, hawks, bats and other species. Each wind turbine requires 900 tons of steel, 2,500 tons of concrete, and 45 tons of non-recyclable plastic (to be disposed of in landfills after the 20-year life of the turbine.) 

Battery back up the turbines for seven consecutive windless days would require one billion half-ton Tesla batteries costing $6.6 trillion. That means still more raw materials, hazardous chemicals and toxic metals. Then there would be thousands of miles of new transmission lines to connect the turbines to the grid. 

“Green” energy is basically a hoax. The world runs on fossil fuels and will continue to do so until nuclear energy is adopted on a mass scale, or another reliable, high-intensity energy source is discovered. As Matt Ridley argues, in 2014, the last year for which there are reliable figures, wind power supplied zero percent (rounded to a whole number) of the world's energy consumption.

  

Empty Gestures on Climate Change

Bjørn Lomborg writes that climate campaigners and the media urge people to change their everyday behaviour - like switching to energy-efficient light bulbs, washing clothes in cold water, eating less meat and buying an electric car. Such gestures have only a limited effect on emissions. For example, unplugging a phone charger when not in use would save less than 1/2,000 of the average person's CO2 emissions. Moreover, charging accounts for less than 1% of a phone's energy needs; the other 99% comes from handset manufacture and operating of the data centres and cell towers. 

Going vegetarian reduces individual CO2 emissions by 540 kg, or just 4.3% of the emissions of an average developed-country individual. An electric car with a range of 400 km has a huge carbon deficit when it hits the road, and will start saving emissions only after being driven 60,000 km. Yet, most EV owners use them as a second care. 

We spend $129 billion/year subsidizing solar and wind energy, but these sources supply just 1.1% of our global energy needs. The IEA estimates that by 2040 – after we have spent a whopping $3.5 trillion on additional subsidies – solar and wind will still meet less than 5% of our needs.


Friends of Science’s Goal: To educate the public about climate science and through them bring pressure to bear on governments to engage in public debates on the scientific merits of the hypothesis of human induced global warming and the various policies that intend to address the issue. Please donate through our website.

This issue of FoS Extracts is also found at <https://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=519>. Current and previous issues of FoS Extracts, FoS Climate Science and FoS Quarterly Reports are at <https://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=605>

You can also visit our other website at <http://www.climatechange101.ca>


 


web design & development by: